I will summarize the key points as I see them, focusing on the centralization question.
- Our current state of centralization is by your design.
- The DAO has not engaged, pushed, or prioritized using your GTC to continue decentralization further, so decentralization has stalled.
My view is that the lack of protocol/market fit + lack of sustainability of Gitcoin are larger and more imminent threats.
- Adjusting the current state is not a priority at this time.
And even if I could understand the progress, the workstreams are relatively ungovernable because they are large, centralized, monolithic, and there is no alternative to each workstreams governance proposal each quarter.
- Interesting, this could be solved by moving to a PMO (project management office) design where budgets are approved (by voters) by project+milestones vs. by function+period. Without an org. redesign.
Because of this, most of my delegates are insiders who can understand the nuances of each proposal.
- Helpful, we can use this when challenged on the forum about insiders making decisions.
So - let’s get a temp check: lets assume >15 responses is significant.
Readers, please let us know in this anonymous poll - what do you think about decentralizing our current DAO Governance.
-
- Decentralization is not a priority for Season 17
-
- I am unsure or undecided or have no opinion
-
- Decentralization is a priority, and should be worked in Season 17
0
voters