FDD Workstream Q4 2021 Budget Proposal
On Snapshot 10/29/21 - 11/5/21
Workstream Mandate: Defend Gitcoin (Grants, DAO, & future products) from threats to its legitimacy, credible neutrality, and sustainability.
Budget Request
Request to send 76,500 GTC to the FDD-WG multisig to fund their Q4 2021 budget.
Gnosis Safe address: 0xD4567069C5a1c1fc8261d8Ff5C0B1d98f069Cf47
Video Statement from Disruption Joe
High Level Budget Breakdown
Q4 Budget Total = 56,500 GTC ($10/GTC)
PLUS Q1 2022 Defense Reserves = 40k GTC (Typo of 2024 on snapshot)
Total Needed = 96,500 GTC
MNUS Current Reserves = 20k GTC
Total Amount requested at this time = 76,500k GTC
Q4 (11/1/21 - 1/31/21) Total Expenses Estimate = $565,000
Breakdown of the Q4 budget estimate by Initiative/Squad
We will add the final Q3 numbers to the snapshot vote. (Quarter hasnât ended yet)
Both defense and dao support are seeing an increase in budget amounts because Q3 was a period of finding new contributors and allowing them to develop broader plans. These squads will all be functioning from day 1 of Q4 rather than starting part way through the quarter. Additionally, Q3 only had 10 weekly epochs where Q4 and forward will have 13 weekly epochs.
Defense = $398,000
The defense budget has been raised by $150,000. These increases are primarily in three areas. The Blockscience contract will have 3 months of payment rather than 1 this quarter. The anti-sybil pipeline is developing a contributor run algorithm which will run parallel to the Bsci algo. Lastly, we have developed a plan for our research initiative to begin finding new threats.
-
BlockScience = $105k (+$70k)
- Increase because only one month of Q3 was paid by FDD. Gitcoin Holdings had paid before.
-
Anti-Sybil = $86k (+$60k)
- Adding a community run algorithm to run alongside Bsci algo
- Adding open source feature engineering pipeline
- Adding on-chain forensics to features
-
Evaluation Squads = $41k (+$5k)
- Increasing to 350 human evaluations for ml supervision
-
Policy = $33k (+$13k)
- Expanding to design full appeals process
- Maintaining policy in the new DAO Knowledge Base
-
Research = $76k (+$60k)
- Having 4 GitcoinDAO researchers participate in TE Open Science studying compensation models in other DAOs
- Developing stream with bottoms up model from the start
- Study of curation game incentives
- Study and topology list of governance considerations for new squads
-
FDD Workstream Leads = $57k (+24k)
- Christine from PTE on Trial to FTE Standard
- No increase for Disruption Joe
- 3 more weekly epochs in the season than Q3
DAO Support = $167,000
The DAO support budget continuing to be administered by FDD was ratified by the crossStream DAOops Governance Squad on 10/19/21. This group has representatives from all the GitcoinDAO workstreams. FDD will help accelerate these squads to maturity and transfer any unused funds budgeted at such a time that the streams âspin-out.â More details can be found in the State of FDD document.
- Community/Onboarding = $40k (+$30k) Potential community stream
- Decrease time to value for new contributors
- Improving the onboarding UX
- Develop stakeholder engagement plans for token holders, stewards, contributors and community
- Cross Stream DAOops = $44k (+$21k) Potential DAOops stream
- Support of CrossStream DAOops Panel to align on changes which affect more than one workstream
- Ensure all streams have access to the subject matter experts and owners of software with access & knowledge of dependencies
- Providing a âone stop shopâ to find the part of the DAO you need
The community & cross stream DAOops both are a unique situation. While FDD supported spinning out the Data & DevOps stream, we do not support spinning out these functions until there is a clear governance model which provides equal voice to the other workstreams of the DAO. This is because the decisions made by this group will directly affect ALL of the other workstreams.
We solved this by creating a CrossStream DAOops Governance Squad with representation from all the workstreams, however, we have not developed a structured governance mechanism for it capable of handling contentious decisions. Here are the requirements FDD would suggest to be enacted prior to spin out:
1. A decision making process for how to change the decision making process of the stream in a legitimate way. (Peaceful transfer of power)
2. Have demonstrated the ability to administer dynamic payments to contributors. (At this point even if spun out, FDD may have to administer the payments)
3. A governance model that equally represents all the workstreams and has an adaptation process for new workstreams to participate.
Please debate here. If not contentious, FDD will continue with the snapshot vote for the full amount of this budget. If there is disagreement, we will take these streams off the FDD budget.
The risk of this decision includes:
1. Contributors having consistent payments
2. The crossstream executive functions being governed by a small group that does not represent the entire DAO.
User support is on the progressive decentralization plan below. Estimate spin out Q1-Q2 of 2022.
- User Support = $83k (+$38k) Potential community or support stream
- Double the number of Discord support contributors
- Incentivize content adding and curation for Knowledge Base
- Expand translations for knowledge base & API docs
- Develop comprehensive ambassador support plan
Spun Out During Q3 - Will join dGrantsGitcoin workstream
- Data & DevOps = $139k (+$119k)
- Realized the need during GR11
- This stream will allow BlockScience to hand off ML algo
- Hire ML Operations Manager
- Hire DevOps Cloud Engineer
- Hire Data Engineer
- Running microservices for ml algorithms
- Creating a community data lake for open science (Non-PII)
- Developing reporting and analytics framework
During Q3 many of the roles were filled partway into the quarter. For Q4, we will have these contributors consistently executing from the beginning of the quarter in almost every stream.
See the State of FDD workstream Q3 2021 with details on the following TL:DR points.
Key points from State of FDD Q3 2021 below:
Categories of Serving Our Mandate
We see two broad categories of how the FDD workstream has served this mandate during Q3.
Defense
Anti-sybil, grant policy, user policy, policy enforcement, and research. These were the original streams anticipated in the Q3 budget which are directly related to defending the network.
We estimate the quarterly value our defensive actions have provided to the GitcoinDAO to be in the range of $150,000 - 400,000 and growing.
The anti-sybil efforts have saved the community $55,000 since GR9. This doesnât include the amount that was deterred, the attackers who gave up, and the attacks made no longer possible by our increasing of the cost of attack
Unmitigated it wouldnât be unreasonable to think the amount FDD anti-sybil work alone saves the community is most likely in the range of $100k to $250k or per quarter (napkin math). And that number grows every round.
Additionally, through the grant approval and disputes processes, we now have community oversight of all content moderation decisions. This manifests itself in the community being able to establish norms like Tornado Cash and MatrixETF being flagged for having raised funding and voluntarily giving up their match eligibility.
These two simple acts returned over $50,000 to the community during GR11.
Lastly, we must also consider the value that is generated by maintaining legitimacy.
DAO Support
Data & DevOps was on the Q3 budget. User Support was added just after it passed. DAOops was added to ensure contributors getting paid. Community spun out of DAO ops. These are the streams the FDD decided to support financially due to critical need for the function and/or for administrative support.
All of these streams will have the autonomy to direct their own budget with oversight from FDD.
They will reserve the ability to âspin-outâ when they have shown their model has reached a needed level of maturity for critical functions. This may include a roadmap for decentralization as a structured stream which will the apply to the DAO directly for its future funding.
Maturity of the stream âspin-outsâ will be based on the consensus of the stream itself, FDD, the DAOops Governance Panel, and finally a steward vote to approve their next seasonal budget. At the time of approval, FDD will transfer any unused budget the stream has.
Progressive Decentralization Roadmap
The stream structure guides how value flows within the workstream. These will be progressively decentralized across five phases.
Exploration (Q3 2021 - Q4 2021)
Leads are appointed to make the decisions with autonomy at each level of organization. The higher level leads ensure budget is made available for critical functions and the multisig oversees the stream leads. Payments are made directly from FDD ops to contributors.
Workstream
- Participation Decisions = Joe (Multisig veto)
- How budget is split between initiatives = Joe (Multisig Veto)
Initiatives
- Participation Decisions = Lead (Joe veto)
- How budget is split between squads = Lead (Joe veto)
Squads
- Participation Decisions = Lead (Joe veto)
- How budget is split between initiatives = Lead (Joe Veto)
Family (Q4 2021 - Q2 2022)
Self governance experiments start in the squads. This means squads will track a mechanism design model via excel or use of a tool and act âas ifâ. Payments are still sent directly from FDD payment wallet to contributors.
Workstream
- Participation Decisions = Joe (Multisig veto)
- How budget is split between initiatives = Joe (Multisig Veto)
Initiatives
- Participation Decisions = Lead (Joe veto)
- How budget is split between squads = Lead (Joe veto)
Squads
- Participation Decisions = Self-Governance Experiment (Joe veto)
- How budget is split between initiatives = Self-Gov Experiment (Joe Veto)
Community (Q1 2022 - Q4 2022)
Squads use algorithms to guide payments and manage governance decisions using non-transferrable governance shares. The initiatives aggregate squad contributions and experiment with self governance.
Workstream
- Participation Decisions = Joe (Multisig veto)
- How budget is split between initiatives = Joe (Multisig Veto)
Initiatives
- Participation Decisions = Self Gov Experiment (Joe veto)
- How budget is split between squads = Self Gov Experiment (Joe veto)
Squads
- Participation Decisions = Self-Governance
- How budget is split between initiatives = Self-Governance
Ecosystem (Q3 2022 - Q4 2023)
Squads with individual sustainable goals are ready to release tokens which may or may not be linked to governance decisions. This allows the market to find the balance between labor and capital and for the squad to have permissionless operation.
Workstream
- Participation Decisions = Self Governance Experiment (Multisig veto)
- How budget is split between initiatives = Self Gov Exp (Multisig Veto)
Initiatives
- Participation Decisions = Self Governance
- How budget is split between squads = Self Governance
Squads
- Participation Decisions = Permissionless
- How budget is split between initiatives = Permissionless
Metaverse (Goal State)
Every level of the FDD is fully permissionless, open, transparent, modular, composable, and autonomous. All initiatives and the workstream itself either disolve or become permissionless catalysts of specific impact & collaboration goals.
Workstream
- Participation Decisions = Permissionless
- How budget is split between initiatives = Permissionless
Initiatives
- Participation Decisions = Permissionless
- How budget is split between squads = Permissionless
Squads
- Participation Decisions = Permissionless
- How budget is split between initiatives = Permissionless
Multisig Address & Keyholders
Gnosis Safe address: 0xD4567069C5a1c1fc8261d8Ff5C0B1d98f069Cf47
Workstream MultiSig is a Gnosis Safe 4/7 setup with the following keyholders who act as board members representing the four primary substreams and other key stakeholder groups.
- Disruption Joe - Coordinator (Communications & Coordination)
- Michael Zargham - Data Science (Anti-Sybil as a Service)
- Angela Kreitenweis/conectopia - (Research & Policy)
- Trueblocks - Data & DevOps (Technology Operations)
- Bob Jiang - Community Contributors
- Andrew Penland - Academic Oversight
- Lefteris Karapetsas - Gitcoin Users
All multisig keyholders are represented by their LLC and are not personally connected or liable for actions of the FDD or GitcoinDAO
All keyholders are confirmed as committed to the responsibilities outlined in the FDD-WG Multisig Keyholder Responsibilities document.
This budget request is set to double our estimated quarterly defense budget for defensive measures to ensure that this workstream can properly function without issue in the instance of delayed votes, market downturns, & political issues.
In Conclusion
By the end of Q3 (10/31/21), FDD will have distributed over $200k in rewards to contributors. These participants are dedicated, hard-working, and values aligned.
We also want to be sure that they are being fairly compensated. During Q4 we will investigate how an external pay audit could work to ensure that our contributors are properly recognized.
This workstream needs the funding to protect both the grants mechanism and the GitcoinDAO while we work to solve these complex issues.strong text