[PROPOSAL]: Gitcoin DAO 2026 Budget Request: Second Tranche (Revised and Expanded)

[PROPOSAL]: Gitcoin DAO 2026 Budget Request: Second Tranche (Revised and Expanded)

TL;DR

This request covers the second tranche of the DAO’s 2026 operating budget, covering July 2026 to December 2026. It revises and expands the second tranche that was outlined in the original 2026 Budget Request.

This is a $1M bet on our new direction, and if we’re successful, we’ll see inbound philanthropic capital to the value of $30M, and PMF across multiple cities.

When the 2026 budget was approved, we signalled that the year would be spent identifying the strategic focus that would define Gitcoin’s next era, with a decision expected toward year end. We have reached that focus ahead of schedule. That focus is a local-first platform, and this request resources its execution: advisory support, new hires, user acquisition, and a go-to-market motion that were not contemplated in the original second-tranche figure.


Why ‘We Are Back’ Early

We are continuing to Fund What Matters but instead of by/for Ethereum, we are funding what matters with Ethereum for the world. This is our logical continuation of all the work we’ve already accomplished thus far. We have conviction in this direction as there is an expected value of $30M more capital inflow into our work.

The original 2026 request framed the year as a search: lean operations, strategic optionality, and a focus decision expected at the end of 2026. That search has now been resolved.

We aim to build a local-first platform that helps AI-displaced professionals move from isolation into trusted, real-world communities that provide jobs, mutual aid, and eventually civic power. To move isolated, economically vulnerable individuals facing rapid technological displacement out of digital paralysis and into highly organized, resilient, federated real-world networks. These local networks will possess the collective economic weight, shared care infrastructure, and data sovereignty necessary to out-compete and permanently replace extractive corporate network monopolies.

We’re building a consumer app that helps people spend more time and money in their local community, instead of defaulting to online platforms and national chains. The app curates everything happening locally in one place: independently owned businesses, events, festivals, nonprofits, volunteer opportunities, and community gathering spots. It surfaces these local options at the moment someone is about to reach for an online default. When a user opens Amazon, the app can suggest a local shop that carries what they need. When they open Facebook looking for something to do, it can show who’s gathering nearby tonight.

The problem it targets: people consistently say they want to support local businesses, meet their neighbors, and spend less time online. But the information they’d need to actually do those things is scattered across dozens of sources, often out of date, and buried under algorithms designed to keep attention online. The app closes that gap by making local, in-person options as easy to find and act on as the online alternatives.

What the app will enable users to accomplish:

  • Discover local businesses, events, and gathering places they didn’t know existed
  • Find real things to do in their community on any given night
  • Redirect everyday spending toward locally owned businesses
  • Get involved with nonprofits and volunteer opportunities near them
  • Spend less time on their phone and more time in their community

The New Strategy

What we are building

We are giving this a full, best-foot-forward try at product-market fit.

Core operating logic:

  1. Curate existing supply before creating new supply. Auto-ingest local directories, calendars, and nonprofit data; businesses can claim or opt out of their page. We don’t make the supply — we aggregate it and drive demand to it.
  2. Behavior-driving, not data harvesting. Collect only data tied to outcomes we’re driving (interests, location, explicit preferences, thumbs up/down on matches). If the information isn’t changing offline behavior, we’re failing.
  3. Many cities from day one (or very early). Network value scales superlinearly; single-city products can’t compete (the Uber lesson). An alpha testing zone; launch is closer to 10 cities, same app everywhere.
  4. Parallel, not replacement. This rides alongside the extractive economy. Moving even ~10% of local spend from monopolies into local circulation is the massive win.

Positioning category: intentional-tech / “I want to be on my phone less and in my community more” (adjacent to Light Phone, Daylight, Meadow). Localism / “I care about my local community and want to see it thrive”

The data layer (sovereign, locally owned, peer-verified — “the map of the town nobody can buy”) is retained as backend architecture and long-term theory of change, not the consumer pitch. Never lead with “data commons” outside technical audiences. Seeding this layer is now an active workstream.

North-star metric: a verified in-real-life action.

What does success look like in 2026

Through our external advisor and the new fundraising lead, we will be chasing large philanthropic funds deployed, in order to offset our spend and extend our runway.

How it relates to the existing Gitcoin Grants program

Gitcoin will still operate under two funding streams: the treasury that funds the DAO’s opex, and the matching pool funding any rounds we run. The matching funds will be used towards public goods, as is the mandate for the pool. We will be funding a Node Zero round with these funds in October.

In addition to the product we will build, we will continue to deploy capital allocation tools, such as QF, but to a broader network of builders outside of web3. We understand that the ecosystem is changing, and it’s time to expand beyond web3 to fully grab the market. This is aligned with our new AI resilience strategy

H1 2026 Progress

Operations and governance

Gitcoin Grants / program

We are actively shifting the Gitcoin Grants Program into a new fund that will continue funding public goods, yet rather focused on localism activities, real-world solutions as well as supporting this strategy directly.

H1 2026 spend summary

Q1 (Jan–Mar): $159,891 spent vs. $245,336 budget, a 34.8% underspend ($85,445). A deliberately lean experimentation quarter; the big variance was Venture Scale Bets at 67% under plan.

Q2 (Apr–Jun): $310,502 spent vs. $294,993 budget, a 5.3% overspend ($15,509). The overspend hides a recomposition, not growth: ~$115K moved from Venture Scale Bets (-92.3%) into product build under Other Consultants (+382%). The two lines offset within $272, so it’s one decision, not two.

Full Q1 & Q2 Budget Reports.

Treasury and financial sustainability

The DAO stayed within its overall envelope for the half: ~$470K spent against ~$540K budgeted, roughly 13% under plan. The Q1 reserve of $85,445 more than covered the Q2 overage, so the overspend was funded from reserves in hand, not new draw, leaving ~$69,936 carried into H2. Headcount held to plan both quarters and software ran under, so runway discipline held; the real change is qualitative, with capital shifting from discretionary bets to direct build, plus the cost of the Tally migration and upgrades. Q3 watch-items are all new-category spend: elevated consultants, Venture Scale Bets sunsetting, paid acquisition, and G&A becoming a budgeted line.

Current Treasury Balance and runway

Current balance: $6,897,677.00 As of Jul 23, 2026

Current Matching Pool Balance and runway

Current balance: $10,189,330 As of Jul 23, 2026


Budget Request

The DAO is requesting $1,182,814 (including reserve offset) as the revised second tranche, to fund July - December 2026. This is $666,818 above the second tranche as originally outlined, to resource the new strategy, minus reserve offset of unspent budget of H1.

This new funding accounts for a monthly advisor, new hires, lower-tier paid acquisition, podcast production and engineering costs.

We will continue to post quarterly updates on the forum to maintain accountability against this request.


Budget Breakdown and Team Structure

Team structure

Role Status Focus Area
Chief of Staff and Head of Ops Full-time Operations
Marketing Lead Full-Time Marketing
Engineering Lead (new hire) Full-Time Engineering
Strategy Consultant Part Time Strategy
Fundraising & Growth Lead - hiring in process Full-Time Sales / BD
Product Lead (new hire) Part Time Product
Field Operator(s) - hiring in process Part-Time IRL Operations

Additional support includes:

  • External advisory support (monthly)
  • Website design & engineering support (project-based contractors)
  • Accounting management (new addition)
  • Monthly legal support (new addition), which is in support of our potential refactor in the future.
  • New hires expanded:
    • Field Operator: on-the-ground presence and get the product into the community’s real social fabric, so that newly onboarded working professionals reliably take a verified real-world action
    • Fundraising & Growth Lead: Ownership of philanthropic fundraising efforts.
    • Product Lead: Ownership of product development and direction (onboarded).
    • Engineering Lead: Building and owning the platform that Gitcoin 3.3 runs on (onboarded).

Detailed Cost Categories

A. Continuing DAO operations (second-tranche portion)

Category Amount
Head Count $512,404
Consultants $460,050
Software and subscriptions $35,497
Travel, Lodging & Meals $10,000
General & Administrative $65,000
Growth & Brand $180,000
Subtotal, continuing operations $1,262,951

Category Breakdown:

Headcount:

This covers Full-Time and Part-Time contributors, focusing on Operations, Marketing, Strategy, Engineering, Product, Security Consultant, BD/Sales, Field Operations.

Consultants:

Includes other consultants we work with, including advisorship, support ops, website/design support, accounting management, EA & calendar management support, additional agency support for brand/marketing.

Software & Subscriptions:

Any paid subscriptions for product, engineering, operations, or otherwise administrative needs such as email, X, etc.

Travel, Lodging & Meals:

Any travel that’s covered by the DAO, including conferences, offsites, or general travel. NOTE: for H2, we do not have a large travel budget as we don’t plan on attending Devcon. Rather, we will hold a team offsite in August and sponsor a local, values aligned event during our launch period. If there are any alternative events that we plan to attend, this will be a separate budget request.

General & Administrative:

This cost includes any administrative costs associated with governance upgrades, unforeseen admin costs, stewardship program, or conference sponsorships.

Growth & Brand:

This is allocated towards Media (podcast production), & paid marketing acquisition.


Quarterly Budget Distribution

Quarter Amount
Q3 $647,159
Q4 $615,793
Total $1,262,951

Reporting Framework

We will provide quarterly updates focused on:

  • Progress against the new strategy’s gates and milestones
  • Budget utilization metrics
  • Gitcoin Grants / program updates
  • Community feedback synthesis
  • Treasury management status

Tranche and Treasury Mechanics

This request is denominated and disbursed in USDC. No price conversion applies. Reserve adjustments have been applied, and we won’t be requesting additional reserves as our standard practice as those have been carried forward.

NOTE: We are currently in the process of upgrading our governance Governor on Cactus (formerly Tally), therefore in the interest of time saved, we will move funds from the Emergency Treasury Multisig into the EC multisig. Once executed, the transaction hash will be posted in this thread. This remains in-line with governance security measures we had to put in place earlier this year. Once the governor is upgraded, we’ll move the funds back into the Timelock.


Voting Details

  1. Yes, fund the second tranche’s expanded scope and budget
  2. No, do not fund the second tranche’s expanded scope
  3. No, do not fund the second tranche’s expanded scope: fund the original approved budgeted amount.
  4. Abstain

Should this vote pass by GTC token delegate vote, funds will be deposited into the EC multisig (repurposed for the DAO).


Feedback is welcomed on this budget request!

6 Likes

i am supportive of this budget request, with the following caveats:

  1. the spend must turn into tangible fundraise momentum by EOY.
  2. the spend must turn into product market fit (a successful campaign) by EOY

if these conditions are met, i think were doubling down in early 2027. if they are not met, i think were likely tearing down this direction in early 2027

Disclaimer: This post is for informative purposes only and is not financial advice. This post reflects my personal views, not a decision or commitment by Gitcoin governance. Forward-looking items in it are targets, not commitments. The information in these posts is subject to change as we continue learning. This post may contain estimates, may contain errors, and is provided on a best-effort basis. DYOR, do not make any financial decisions based on these posts.

5 Likes

I am supportive of this budget after having been closely involved in recent steward discussions. It’s a big pivot, and agree with Owocki that this is go big or go home time.

1 Like

The expanded budget makes sense to me given the new direction and the work laid out. The clear milestones and reporting commitments also provide a concrete way to evaluate progress as we go. I’m supportive.

1 Like

I’m overall supportive of the large budget request due to Owocki’s clarification that we need momentum on both increasing the matching pool and PMF by early 2027. Better to spend now and fail early then to keep a low burn but take longer to change course

At a larger level I wonder whether the future will be interest-first social media (like Reddit where people organize around a shared interest) or a local first one as Gitcoin is betting the house on. I also wonder whether the GTM of a funding platform is the right method to pilot and get adoption of the network. Those are maybe the 2 other aspects I’d keep tabs on as the experiment progresses.

I’m supportive of the budget here and agree it is a pivotal moment. I think the product focus positions Gitcoin to provide common sense benefit to intersecting communities while leaving space for the experiments in participatory governance and mutualist economics that will help Ethereum rebuild the legitimacy we know it deserves.

As the product enters into development I hope it a) takes advantage of the rich ecology of projects that have been exploring the same territory (some of which are thriving, some of which are dead with valuable open repositories left in their wake), and b) takes the time to think through what reciprocity with those projects would look like (whether they are living or dead).

This proposal is now live on Snapshot

Offering my 2 cents as I’ve been both a long time Gitcoin user and recipient with funding that has led to direct real worl dadoption and impact helping to bring web3 to the world through our work at rifaisicilia.com and the broader ReFi ecosystem and especially with our flexible full stack regenerative residency that aims to train and onboard “displaced professionals” with the tools needed for the new economy.

This is directionally correct that people want to access and support their cosmo-local economy. My suggestion is that there is already plenty of latent partners in the existing gitcoin ecosystem that can be integrated on launch that have local brick and mortar business and digital apps that need a catalyst to finance and economically support on the ground activities. Priority should be taken to work with them.

A lot of regenerative businesses don’t yet exist and there is a big financing gap. For people that want to support their local economy, also means investing and lending and buying from these new regenerative businesses. Gitcoin can be an aggregator and discoverability platform, but also a financing vehicle for regen startups that can provide a return to the Gitcoin treasury. This is what we are building at growfi.dev that allows for onchain crowdlending with yield paid from regenerative returns. We would be happy to work with the Gitcoin DAO, ecosystem, and app to help provide financing rails for the developing cosmo-local economy.

Finally, Gitcoin is a global community, and if there is a coordinated launch, please be present in more places than just North America.

Thanks for reading. You can find me at regenavocado (@regenavocado) / X

1 Like

i agree; we should not reinvent the wheel.

happy to explore what this looks like

2 Likes

Snapshot Proposal passed with 112% quorum. Once the funds are deposited into the EC multisig, I’ll post the transaction hash.

1 Like

See all txs here, including a test and two transactions transferring funds into the EC multisig from the Emergency Treasury Multisig.

Hi!

Its one of these strange online/offline async interactions.

I have watched a couple of videos, like this one:

  • S2 EP 7 | Project Liminality: Stories, Crypto, and the Shift to a Regenerative Future

And generally have been following the space since 2015.

I liked the phrase here “miracles over marketing” but that maybe left for another deeper post (see Idea machines if you are too curious idea-machines )

It is interestin to see the term “cosmo-local economy” what does it mean?

@regenavocado Have you build a hub like this already?

link

In your relationshipo with the land what kind of techniques do you use? Phoebe Tickell did this as a case study at moralimaginations DOT com, using a : INTERSPECIES COUNCIL

  • link -

You can spend 1 hour and 20 min on hearing this talk , explaining michel bauwens it, who I think coined the term: - link -
This was the kickstarter/fundingevent for: cosmolocal DOT

Or explorer the concept here: - link -
you may spent there 5900 tokens of attenion , ah I mean words

How does it look like in practice? the hub from above and the P4P principles from bauwens?
Like this:

  • link -

So what kind of tools would be needed? Sarafu network? Or is Circles enough?

  • link -

Will Rudrick demos here how commitment pooling works and how you can visualize it:

Will video link

On the role of how to - share information - I would like to plug a bit for AT proto. I have been engaged with the muni.town community for a year now - roomy link -

Another thing build on top of AtProto is semble: semble DOT so

Its a kind of shared semantic bookmark sharing.

Roomy and semble are also integrating asharing components, the ecosystem effects in the AtPRoto space are quite big and are even growing further (transclusion for friendly community channels etc.. so its not a simple discord clone)

What kind of static information would be useful to share maybe via semble? How to organise meetings ( roomy for example has OpenMeet integration)

Lots of LEGO’s on the table? What do you want to build?

regards Andreas

I have to admit I really REALLY do not like discourse forumsoftware - but that rant is for another time, the post with all links included can be found in this gist:

gist DOT github DOT com / AndreasS2501 /2a182ef79de2a4a62a2ff02142fa4e62

regards Andreas