I fully agree with this. The bull market has closed our collective eyes and we just thought we will live in Wonderland 4 ever. I sometimes think that our Ethos is too permissive hence we attract a lot of people that could be well intended, but just donāt know what the core mission is and to be honest we also have a lot of people inside the DAO that threat it like a cow and āovermilk itā. ![]()
We discussed than specifically during the Grants weekly tactical( a call setup by Nate that has the scope of coordinating everything related to the gitcoin grants. All workstreams have representatives ,support-Daops, FDD, MMM and PGF). It will help a lot to raise the barrier of entry, but the mindset of the attackers is to game the system and this will just be a matter of āROIā for themā¦(my opinion).
It is not only spammers that we are worried about, we have entire organisations that have the goal of getting that sweet matching⦠In GR12 and GR13 we ācaughtā projects that had 50-150k raised and considerable matchings.
Yes, you are right about that, sorry for the confusion ![]()
I would ask what do you perceive as object level impact zones and how could we tackle those? ![]()
PS. I think you managed decentralizing the ethic very well
. Wish you could also decentralize the responsability in a way that makes others more conscientious ![]()