[S16 Proposal] INTEGRATED DAO Operations Budget Request

Thanks for the feedback! We’re aligned on moving fast to solve this pain point and I will adjust the language to clarify our intent in the integrated budget proposal.

I can testify to the effectiveness of the audit! I removed my permissions and somehow I had them since last year, they were removed, came back, etc. Great work with this one! :smiley: At long last my godlike DIscord powers have been destroyed :rofl:

Maybe I’m not knowledgeable around this, but I am quite surprised to see that Gitcoin DAO still doesn’t have a HR department. Or is each WS supposed to have it? I honestly don’t know, sorry!

GL in season 16 :four_leaf_clover:

1 Like

Hey Zer8, happy to hear the roles powers are fixed for you :slight_smile:

We do have an ‘HR department’ in a way, in the sense that we have People Ops as an initiative within DAO Ops. Next to this each workstream also has a talent coordinator who syncs with the People Ops team. It’s a smaller ‘centralized’ team within daoops, but we support all needs within each workstream as good as we can and based on feedback we adapt what people ops means exactly for Gitcoin. Hope this helps!

2 Likes

As just mentioned on the Stewards Call: I d love to see an extension of your perspective on meetings to the whole workflow.

:pray:

3 Likes

This is a great call out. Recent OS insights extend well beyond the facilitation of meetings, and Kris and I sense the need for DAO Ops to take lead prioritizing how we build the overall canvas, document agreements, and implement any changes that come out of these conversations.

We’ll work to refine this language to better reflect the need.

2 Likes

Hi Jodi - again thank you for our conversations and for educating me about DAO ops and about Gitcoin itself. It was a pleasure working with you on this budget review. Thank you for your patience with me.

On the whole - at the risk of being a lonely voice in the wilderness - I think we should consider whether the DAO is leaning forward too aggressively given unavoidable risks.

1 Like

Had a chance to read through and it has my full support. Very excited that there continues to be many improvements and continued planning around increasing Steward engagement and the simplification of key processes. I see that $20,000 is marked for professional development. What sort of continued education is planned for DAO contributors? Or does everyone choose what they want to do individually on their own?

1 Like

Each contributor decides their own professional development path :slight_smile:

2 Likes

It was great connecting! I read the considerations you laid out in your governance post and agree to a degree that coordinating our resources and developing metrics to track our progress are essential to a successful transition.

For our part our budget is flat with exception for one hire to support our protocol work. We’re starting the process now to keep pace with the DevRel initiative and Design Partner launches happening this season.

I also see cause optimism. As I shared in our 1:1, the workstream coordination continues to improve – we’re asking each other better questions, which in turn is building our strategy muscles. The risks you lay out are good call outs, and ones we’re all thinking about.

Either way, I hope we can count on your support this budget cycle. :slight_smile:

4 Likes

@SLBK123 appreciate your support!

To add to @sandy_gitcoinDAO’s response, last season many contributors used the professional development funds to reimburse costs related to ongoing coaching or classes to level-up in their functional areas. Examples of approved reimbursements include a content writing, agile project management, and full stack engineering courses; we also reimbursed ongoing coaching to improve communication, time management and leadership skills.

We are asking for the same funding amount as last season, which was fully utilized.

3 Likes

Thank you Jodi and Shawn for taking the time to chat with me this week – the time you’ve given to help with onboarding has been amazing and is much appreciated! I’m curious what data you typically use to determine salary range, i.e. for the technical support new role?

1 Like

Hi Rachel! We have been using OpenComp as a standard and combine this with insights across other DAOs. Hope this helps!

2 Likes

Hi Rachel! We have been using OpenComp as a standard and combine this with insights across other DAOs. Hope this helps!

2 Likes

Hi! Thank you for the clarification – much appreciated!

1 Like

To note - This proposal is now live on Snapshot and will be open for your vote through Nov 23, 2022, 6:00 AM EST

https://snapshot.org/#/gitcoindao.eth/proposal/0x08bc5d61cf0e939b333187625eb2f3dce3a630a328db2b76f4776107cf6612c3

2 Likes

Why I have $gtc but can’t vote

Brand new Steward, lacking context. Apologies if questions and comments are naive while I get my footing

  1. The previous budget requests and Season Reserves caught my eye—what was going on between S13 & S14 that led to dramatically large jumps in % unspent?

Screen Shot 2022-11-17 at 7.34.22 AM

  1. Saw that you had trouble tracking engagement in Discord. Not certain of your needs, but I think there are several bots or custom integrations you can implement that will help track your most engaged contributors! Check out https://statbot.net/

and some of the documentation here: Understanding Server Insights

If not, maybe its something that could be built—would be a valuable tool for any community and Gitcoin grantee!

  1. I am a brand new steward and have not seen anything about the Steward Council calls or steward-specific channel yet!

  1. The S16 goals around CSDO sound important! However the outcomes/likely projects seem a bit more vague than what I have seen in other workstream budget proposals. Are there specific KPIs you are trying to meet? Is there existing data on where bottlenecks exist, where contributors fall off, where onboarding stalls, topics that get lost between workstreams etc etc?

Thanks for the time & effort everyone put into this proposal—was very detailed and helpful :slight_smile:

2 Likes

hi @mingyuezong can you DM me and I can help?
discord: shawn16400#5507
twitter: @shawnlgrubb
or here via discourse mail

Hey thanks a lot for the proposal.

I have some comments here. I am not really convinced in how important this workstream’s work is for the operation of the DAO which is bleeding a very big amount of funds in the most severe bear market we have seen in years.

I am happy to see that you have unspent reserves from S15.
I am not happy to see an increase in budget request during such market conditions. If I compare the salaries you guys pay they are higher than I have ever made as an opensource developer, even in good market times.

I am also trying to understand and judge what exactly does the DAO gain from this workstream. Looking at the S16 commitments and the outcomes and initiatives I just don’t see any of these as actually important, except perhaps the Support section which is indeed something Gitcoin should have.

As things currently stand I will have to vote No in this proposal with the feedback being to recognize the terrible state of the market and the industry and adjust the budget accordingly. And to also keep only the stuff that is absolutely essential to the DAO and shed everything else.

2 Likes

I agree with Lefteris. Though I am going to make a harder stand and vote no on this budget request and every other one as well.

We need to make cuts and the only way the stewards can signal it is by voting no.

Voting no on all work streams until we get our spending under control is the only thing I can do at this point, and I hope other Stewards will follow suit. We have given strong warnings over the last few seasons and they don’t seem to be enough.

We cannot spend this much money in this market, it is a bad strategy.

I am happy to work with the Gitcoin Hiring team to explain how Giveth finds intrinsically motivated high caliber contributors in lower income countries to keep our budget at 1/10th of the cost.

2 Likes