As a Gitcoin grantee, I want to express my deep appreciation for every single person here. Yaâll have been an incredible gift. Thank you
Gitcoin has made it possible for me and many others I know to work full-time on using web3 to address climate change, biodiversity collapse and social injustice.
Thanks to @M0nkeyFl0wer and Jon Ruth for bringing this topic to my attention! Happy to chime in.
Postponing GR16 to focus on launching a decentralized version of the protocol in Q1 / Q2 would pose some major challenges to the 300+ projects in our community. Also, as many have mentioned, would create risks for Gitcoin as well. From my experience, shipping production-grade software always takes 2-3x longer than expected, and complex systems are best evolved incrementally over time.
Sunsetting legacy software systems is also best done incrementally over time. Turning the lights out all at once can have major unintended consequences.
Yes, cGrants has a painful UX, and requires significant human resources from the Gitcoin community. I sense a lot of users have complained recently and thatâs adding an additional burden.
But the question is: Would grantees rather have UX pain with funding? OR no UX pain and no funding?
Iâm sure the community would accept the UX pain and rally behind the human-resource intensive tasks if it meant they could still get funding.
The reality is the platform works and itâs being used at scale. Gitcoin just ratified an incredible $4.3M of funding to over 1000 projects. A disruption to the quarterly rhythm would hurt early-stage projects, and communities with lower income and founders from the global south, the same people who are getting hit worst by all the problems we feel so drawn to solveâŠ
At an individual level: there are several founders Iâve recruited personally from communities with low-income who are planning to participate in GR16 that would be negatively affected by a major delay.
My proposal would be to incrementally sunset the centralized grants platform across GR16 and GR17 with a clear roadmap of what aspects are being phased out over a 6-9 month period. Make the announcement early and give the community time. Run a few events across timezones to make sure the info gets out far and wide.
A possible roadmap could be:
- Run GR16 in December (a main round and three cause rounds (Climate, DeSci, DEI))
- Open a short window of grant applications in November for both GR16 and GR17 (mark a hard line)
- Invite partners who are interested in running Grants Protocol instances to onboard contributors for vetting these applications
- Run GR17 in late Q1 / Q2 2023 with no new grant applications and no new user accounts.
- During GR17 spin out 1-2 rounds under the grants protocol for any new applications or any new donors.
You could plan to have GR17 happen 4 or 5 months after GR16 to buy a bit of extra time as well. If people know well in advance, itâs less of a reputationchallenge.
Regarding the resourcing, I donât know all the details but here are some thoughts:
a. Can you turn off any functionality thatâs causing bugs and drawing engineers away from Grants Protocol?
b. Can you significantly reduce marketing for GR16? (let your community do it for you)
c. Can Gitcoin Passport become a requirement?
d. Can you make âdonate to matching poolâ default to drive more funding and easy partnerships burden?
e. Can users donate to a Gitcoin Grants Protocol grant to drive more funding?
f. Can we run a campaign to onboard more grant reviewers and fraud detectors? (ReFi DAO and several other ReFi communities would be keen to help, Iâm sure)
Above all, I think the communications piece is the most important one to get right:
a. Post a tweet from with a poll of the options available
b. Link to this post and invite further conversation
c. Set a final deadline for making a decision on GR16
d. Create a public roadmap for rolling out Grants Protocol & sunsetting cGrants
For background:
Weâve been building an entire ecosystem on top of Gitcoinâs quarterly grant rounds assuming this quarterly cadence will continue (as it has done for almost 4 years). We have invested significant resources in recruiting founders, mentors and investors to make the most of GR16 with a special focus on DEIJ as the heart of regeneration.
Weâre also building a ReFi Passport on top of Gitcoin Passport to create a coordination layer for planet positive behaviors on-chain.
Our plan is to support 80-100 founders across climate, DEI and DeSci rounds in an 8-week program leading up to GR16. Weâd like to donate $7k to the DEI match funding pool to give back and enable diverse founders to experience the power of quadratic funding.
That being said, weâd support any decision the Gitcoin community made and want to partner long-term to fund public goods and scale climate solutions with inclusion at heart.
Big to Gitcoin devs, stewards, volunteers and everyone who makes this QF magic possible. It really is magic.