Option2 seems interesting but the Latin America category definitely has overlap with all other categories. How do we plan to address that?
3 Likes
I really like option 1, and I also want to see what stewards propose
2 Likes
I like option 2, and it’s really fair.
2 Likes
i like option 2 . it is really fair
2 Likes
I didn’t receive a single GTC token while I contributed in round 10
2 Likes
Yeah, probably a bit late to implement for round 10.
Agreed, it would be ideal for the community to decide that as well.
Ideally a TCR or similar.
Do you not have that same concern for the rounds currently?
It’s QF, it maximizes utility.
2 Likes
I do. And this is why I like this pre-allocation of percentages. As it puts a max on certain categories and allows grants of multiple categories to have their chance.
2 Likes
where can I vote? I just new in gitcoin DAO
2 Likes
I prefer option 3… much better for me
2 Likes
Gitcoin Round 10 will very success,I would vote for option two,
2 Likes
I support option 2, I think this option is fair.
2 Likes
thanks for putting this together @james and 
_
super well thought out and answered a lot of my questions around process
1 Like
waiting for next good news from here
1 Like
Great idea.i like option2，but we need some diss and more people
I mean within categories. If you’re worried that the most popular categories will get a disproportionate amount of the funding, are you not also worried that the most popular projects within a category would get a disproportionate amount of funding?
Yep I am. And I have voiced this multiple times as the imo biggest problem of the QF system. That it devolves to a popularity contest.
(But that’s off-topic to this thread)
vote option 2. It’s a good idea
喜欢提议选项2 dapp可以再增加资金支持比例 现在是熊市，能静下心来不受影响的技术人员值得更多支持
1 Like
I like the option 2, the breakdown seems diversified and interesting (dGOv and Latin America) . And Also this option was proposed by the Gitcoin Core team . 
1 Like
Option 2 seem more appropriate to me,it ensures that certain aspects of the cryptospace are not neglected. Every aspects need some reasonable attention. A concentration of funds on only a small fragment is not healthy.