Suggested Solution: I was thinking to implement an arbitrable smart contract that is secured by Celest protocol in a way in which the bounty creator is forced to lock the reward into the contract so in case of a dispute Celest court can decide for the reward.
I also want to implement it in a way so that the locked money will be pipe into a yield farming protocol ( like 88mph ) so the locked money wonât be idle. The generated profit from 88mph will be distributed between bounty owner and GTC stakers.
I think itâs a legitimate question to ask, are âThese Bountiesâ sustainable, from the developer perspective but also from the bounty creator âvisionâ.
Itâs not the first time I can see or read a user or dev âNot Complainingâ but simply demanding inquiries about the payments following his work on a particular bounty.
What is the definition of sustainability: Good Coordination, Good Communication, Supportable, Viable, Livable and feasibleâŚ
I think you bring a good point that we could discuss further with the community.
@bobjiang Oh, no. Itâs actually a private repo hosted at https://artisticalintelligence.art/ and Happily, the owner started to communicating again, and everything is fine for now. But I think if weâre going to make bounties decentralized we need to first make them trustless and censorship-resistant.
So glad it has worked out!
The owner disappearing is not exactly a fitting set of circumstances for an interesting set of âconflict resolutionâ techniques.
Now, if they claimed that the deliverable was lacking and refused to payâŚ
Would such a scenario make an interesting test case for a head-to-head Kleros and Celeste comparison, or is it too specific or too trivial?
