How should I change my delegations? [Q2 2022]

[owocki]

@epowell101

I guess one question back to @owocki would be do you agree with the premise that more active participants in the metagovernance of Gitcoin are likely good people to delegate to? Or is the premise of the project wrong?

Activity is one of the criteria I look at but not the only criteria. Activity is necessary but not sufficient IMO. Definitely top 5. (But I’m just one voice. Other ppl might have different criteria)

I posted a bit more on the criteria I look at on in this post from last week:

@owocki

short term,

1. i delegated heavily to janine, kyle, olsen, and griff because Gitcoin is in a place of change into a protocolDAO and i see these people actively helping create clarity there.
2. i delegated to griff because I admire what Giveth has done in the space, especially how quickly they iterate, and i’d welcome his presence stewarding Gitcoin.

I dont have a super formalized list of criteria mapped out. Which is why I think maybe sounding it out on a product-design call might be fruitful.

@owocki

@epowell101 if you want id be happy to do a product interview with whomever built daostewards and talk through “what would have to be true for me to use it in my “quarterly delegation reshuffle flow”?” since i’m an outsider and someone who is managing GTC delegations, i make a good crash test dummy. email me kevin@supermodular.xyz if you want to take me up on it!

---

Disclaimer: This post is for informative purposes only and is not financial advice. This post reflects my personal views, not a decision or commitment by Gitcoin governance. Forward-looking items in it are targets, not commitments. The information in these posts is subject to change as we continue learning. This post may contain estimates, may contain errors, and is provided on a best-effort basis. DYOR, do not make any financial decisions based on these posts.