Hiring Freeze? 🧊

Given the recent concerns about the market turning bearish and the DAO’s effectiveness vis-a-vis it’s spend, I am considering what it would look like if we tightened our belts over at Gitcoin Holdings.

I am going to be proposing a Hiring Freeze to Gitcoin Holdings’ Leadership team on Monday.

A little Gitcoin History: During the Great Bear, Gitcoin was 12 people. We survived + ran Grants rounds for over 2 years at this team size. So I know it’s possible to operate with a bit more of a scarcity mindset.

Of course, that was 0 to 1 Gitcoin, and we are now pursuing 1 to 10 Gitcoin. Gitcoin has ballooned to 100+ contributors, and we’ve grown very quickly - Some people have turned around from being hired themselves to hiring 1-4 people themselves during the next several months of joining. Of course, it is hard to scale culture this way - as the values the team starts with (in 2018-2020, leanness, a focus on shipping product - among other things) are likely to get inflated away.

It is my opinion that we’ve jumped from 0 to 1 straight to 10 to 100 without actually hitting the milestones that the 1 to 10 phase would imply (growing GMV, retiring 1.0 / shipping the 2.0 version of the Dapp + getting traction). I think it’s time to pump the brakes.

The reasons to consider a hiring freeze are:

  1. Extend runway.
  2. Lower the chances that a RIF is needed for the DAO to survive.
  3. Focus on creating the conditions for more lean operations & high ROI operations.
  4. Stop expecting that we can hire our way out of our problems / to our goals.
  5. Turn the team to those who are the right fit for this stage of the thread.

Of course, Gitcoin Holdings is not GitcoinDAO. I may be the CEO of the Holdings company, and be able to make a call at the Holdings Co, but I am just one node in the GitcoinDAO network. The DAO has no CEO. It is up to workstream leads & DAO leadership whether it wants to tighten it’s belts.

So consider this an FYI. I am posting this thread to overcommunicate in case other workstreams want to do the same as Gitcoin Holdings.


Disclaimer: This post is for informative purposes only and is not financial advice. This post reflects my personal views, not a decision or commitment by Gitcoin governance. Forward-looking items in it are targets, not commitments. The information in these posts is subject to change as we continue learning. This post may contain estimates, may contain errors, and is provided on a best-effort basis. DYOR, do not make any financial decisions based on these posts.

8 Likes

found this interesting thread about how coingecko is preparing for a potential bear market


Disclaimer: This post is for informative purposes only and is not financial advice. This post reflects my personal views, not a decision or commitment by Gitcoin governance. Forward-looking items in it are targets, not commitments. The information in these posts is subject to change as we continue learning. This post may contain estimates, may contain errors, and is provided on a best-effort basis. DYOR, do not make any financial decisions based on these posts.

and here is a great article from YC about how their portfolio companies are preparing for the bear (startups are not 1:1 with DAOs but there still may be some good thoughts):


Disclaimer: This post is for informative purposes only and is not financial advice. This post reflects my personal views, not a decision or commitment by Gitcoin governance. Forward-looking items in it are targets, not commitments. The information in these posts is subject to change as we continue learning. This post may contain estimates, may contain errors, and is provided on a best-effort basis. DYOR, do not make any financial decisions based on these posts.

3 Likes