Unfortunately, I need to discuss two products and the shift in governance focus. It is very important to get new partners and new blockchains but it is also crucial to understand who is the cornerstone of this entire platform. So I would like to address some topics for us to discuss further and in my case to understand if it is just my perspective or if other people share the same point of view.
1 - The platform is totally outdated, its decentralized management is paving the way for scammers to circumvent developers (there is no cooperation to protect developers in this regard). The developer is encouraged not to report if he reports nothing will happen because the scammer can make a new account and again apply the same scam.
2 - The initial proposal is if you are a funder and you have already opened more than 3 bounty and never paid a reward (there is a problem there) You can no longer open a reward.
3 - Gitcoin Passport: we can use this beautiful badge platform to validate funders.
web3 is changing:
- we need more integrations
- currently, there is Dework (I believe that the Gitcoin treasure could interact with this platform and the bounty system be replaced by dework, this is an idea we can also discuss)
- The Dework badge system is a very interesting system for curating developers and funders
Moloch already won here and nobody noticed
Public goods is a beautiful OUTDOOR on the avenue displaying the destiny of humanity, everyone sees it and wants to go there but not everyone has a wardrobe to get into Narnia.
I can list some ideas here of Goods with easy financing
Famous projects are benefited
Projects with famous developers
Projects with groups on telegram
Projects with a community structure
But the problem lies if you are an anonymous and reputable developer, even if you get people to fund you you will not receive the correspondent. This happened to me in both rounds. I think I’ll need to fund a telegram group to have a large number of contributions and my grant to be valid for the platform to put me as a grant to receive from the quadratic fund.
So I’m so grateful to Gitcoin for making me go deeper down the rabbit hole every day, but I’m not going to pass on these problems that in the future could end the platform, or does it want it to end? I don’t know. But it is hazardous, Gitcoin is a DAO with an expressive treasure and needs to be used and managed by diverse people from all over the world. That’s what the platform was at the beginning, but I don’t know if the Fitcoin values are still strictly passed on to the new DAO holders.