Gitcoin 3.0 Vision / Mission

Gitcoin 3.0 Vision / Mission

Gitcoin 3.0 is a Network-First Funding Festival designed to tackle Ethereum’s biggest problems. Backed by a well-funded treasury and years of operational runway, it marks a shift from simply running quadratic funding rounds to deploying a pluralism of capital allocation mechanisms—including QF, Retro Funding, DDA, and more. At its core is the Gitcoin Grants (GG) program, now restructured to empower community sensemaking, domain-specific allocation, and competition among diverse capital allocators. Gitcoin 3.0 invites the Ethereum community to not just fund what matters—but to actively shape what gets built and why.

Vision

A future where Ethereum funds its foundations and future through ecosystem coordination.

Mission

Fund What Matters.

How will Gitcoin 3.0 Measure Its Success

I. Core Objective

To become a pillar in Ethereum’s coordination engine for allocating capital to its most important problems—through pluralistic, data-informed, and community-governed mechanisms.


II. Pillars of Success

1. Capital Efficiency

Is Gitcoin moving meaningful capital to high-leverage opportunities—better, faster, and more accurately than alternatives?

Key Metrics

  • Total value routed through Gitcoin programs
  • % of matched capital from non-Gitcoin sources (network effects)

Indicators of Success

  • Repeat funders across GG rounds
  • Co-investment or coordination with values aligned ecosystem players

2. Builder Lifecycle Depth

Does Gitcoin retain and accelerate high-quality builders throughout their lifecycle—from experimentation to impact?

Key Metrics

  • Builder retention rate round-over-round (e.g. GG23 → GG24)
  • Velocity of builder reinvestment into ecosystem (e.g. mentoring, voting, donating)

Indicators of Success

  • Participation in community programs, such as mentorship and onboarding programs
  • Repeat participation in multiple mechanisms (e.g. QF → retro)

3. Ecosystem Legitimacy

Is Gitcoin seen as a pillar to fund what matters in Ethereum?

Key Metrics

  • Ecosystem sentiment (via community polling, social analysis, forum participation)
  • % of domains co-defined or co-managed with other Ethereum entities

Indicators of Success

  • “Gitcoin is so back”
  • High-profile experts in respective domains actively seek Gitcoin

4. Mechanism Innovation

Is Gitcoin advancing the practice of capital allocation?

Key Metrics

  • Success rate of experimental mechanisms based on outcome metrics
  • Community-contributed mechanism upgrades
  • Uptake of Gitcoin mechanisms by other ecosystems

Indicators of Success

  • Gitcoin becomes the testbed for new funding paradigms (e.g. Futarchy, Impact QF)
  • Academic citations or case studies of Gitcoin methods
  • Cross-chain or cross-org adoption of Gitcoin’s allocation protocols

8 Likes

Super refreshing to see this pivot from QF to other allocation mechanisms :seedling:

1 Like

Thank you for the update!
We find the outlined core direction and framework commendable, due to its simplicity, structured nature, and objective measurability.

We have a question regarding the intended use of this.
Following the sensemaking process, is there a consideration to directly integrate key indicators, which could be identified through sensemaking, into this structured framework for impact tracking purposes? This might involve setting meta-level goals based on identified priority issue areas, along with tracking achievement rates against these goals. While we understand this is a high-level vision and mission document not intended for overly detailed metric discussions, we believe incorporating such elements could help us to see if we are moving forward as we intend.