GG23 OSS Program Quadratic Funding Results
Our GG23 OSS Program Quadratic Funding results are live! We’ll have one week for review and feedback then, barring any major issues, will proceed with payouts by May 2, 2025.
The OSS Mature Builders Retro Funding round results will be posted to the forum next week in a separate post.
TL;DR
- In GG23, we moved towards a deeper builder-centric approach in the way we fund public goods, focusing on supporting builders at every stage of growth through a new pluralistic, multi-mechanism design.
- We implemented the same two-pronged sybil resistance strategy as we’ve been using since GG20. We used a pluralistic variant of QF and we used Passport’s model based detection system. We did not do any closed-source silencing of sybils/donors. Instead, we’re solely relying on our mechanism and Gitcoin Passport.
- Discussion will be open for one week before payouts are concluded. A GG23 pre-ratification proposal was passed through governance, speeding up the process of payouts to grantees.
GG23 Overview
Every round sees new developments. Some of the most exciting in GG23 included:
- A multi-mechanism OSS Program, with early-stage projects participating in Quadratic Funding, and piloting Retro Funding for GG’s Top 30 Mature Builders.
- 6+ Community Rounds. Read the GG23 announcement post for all the details.
- We introduced Grant Ships as the new mechanism to host and support Community Round governance, including a new competitive model.
- Providing the same sybil resistance tooling we use for our rounds to every community using Grants Stack by creating a cluster-matching calculator and integrating with Passport’s model based detection.
- Introduced a new GTC Staking experiment.
- Consolidating all of our program rounds onto Arbitrum.
OSS Program Quadratic Funding Rounds: Key Metrics
3 Program Rounds
$600k Matching
$95,278.16 Total Crowdfunded
9991 Unique Donors
235 Projects
Round & Project Spotlight
Here are the top five projects by total matching funding (gleaned from the overall matching results). The projects on this list are the ones with the most diverse bases of support, regardless of the size of the base.
GG23 OSS Developer Tooling & Libraries
View this round’s report card here.
Project Name | Matching Funds (USDC) | Matching Funds (USD) |
---|---|---|
Human Passport (formerly Gitcoin Passport) | 20000 | $19,997.88 |
rekt.news - The dark web of DeFi journalism | 20000 | $19,997.88 |
growthepie ![]() ![]() |
20000 | $19,997.88 |
OpenZeppelin Contracts Library | 20000 | $19,997.88 |
Open Source Observer | 20000 | $19,997.88 |
GG23 OSS dApps & Apps
View this round’s report card here.
Project Name | Matching Funds (USDC) | Matching Funds (USD) |
---|---|---|
Karma GAP | 10000.0 | $9,998.94 |
Treegens DAO🌳 | 9367.02 | $9,366.03 |
GainForest | 9293.43 | $9,292.44 |
Kolektivo Network | 8698.34 | $8,697.42 |
$EARTH | 8213.56 | $8,212.69 |
GG23 OSS Web3 Infrastructure
View this round’s report card here.
Project | Matching Funds (USDC) | Matching Funds (USD) |
---|---|---|
BrightID ![]() |
20000 | $19,997.88 |
Superchain Eco | 20000 | $19,997.88 |
ethOS | 19148.79 | $19,146.76 |
eth.limo | 16004.09 | $16,002.39 |
Deep Funding | 12292.52 | $12,291.22 |
Round and Results Calculation Details
Before GG20 began, we proposed a two-pronged sybil resistance strategy. To recap it briefly, we would continue to use COCM (Connection-Oriented Cluster Matching) as we had in GG20 & GG22.
As explained in the post, and the paper which introduced this mechanism to the world, COCM is much less vulnerable to Sybil Attacks than ordinary QF because it reduces the matching of donors who look similar.
In addition, over the past few rounds, Passport’s Model-Based Detection system has yielded greater sybil resistance than the stamp-based system without any of the user friction. When used together, we believe these two tools produce the most sybil-resistant results we’ve ever had.
Connection-Oriented Cluster Matching (COCM)
COCM is an approach within Gitcoin Grants that enhances Quadratic Funding by prioritizing projects with diverse support bases, helping to counteract sybil attacks and coordinated groups trying to unfairly influence funding distribution. Key elements include:
- Diversity Bonus: COCM increases matching funds for projects supported by a wide array of “tribes” or distinct groups, rewarding cross-group support and broad appeal.
- Markov Chain Enhancement: Recent updates to COCM use a Markov chain approach to gauge connection strength between users and projects, providing stronger sybil resistance by analyzing indirect connections.
- Funding Distribution: COCM’s design inherently shifts some funds from top projects to those in the “long tail,” enhancing the reach of smaller or niche projects.
Gitcoin Passport’s Model-Based Detection System
The Gitcoin Passport team has implemented a model that evaluates on-chain activity to detect potential sybil accounts, enhancing funding fairness by:
- Address Probability Scoring: The model assigns each address a probability score, indicating whether it likely belongs to a genuine user or a sybil account.
- Continuous Improvement: While the model sometimes mistakenly flags new users with limited on-chain history, the team is refining the dataset and expanding to include Layer 2 networks, effectively reducing sybil influence on funding results.
These efforts together strengthen Gitcoin’s defenses against manipulation, helping to ensure fair distribution of funds to genuine community-supported projects.
Code of Conduct Reminder
As a reminder to all projects, quid pro quo is explicitly against our agreement. Providing an incentive or reward for individuals to donate to specific projects can affect your ability to participate in future rounds. If you see someone engaging in this type of behavior, please let us know.
We have removed Pheasant Network & Vine Finance from matching due to the fact that both projects participated in quid pro quo during GG23.
Next Steps
We plan to distribute the matching by May 2, 2025, after the results are open for discussion for one week.
It’s worth noting that GG23 pre-approved the matching fund to be paid out before results were posted. This means that the payout process to grantees will occur faster, after this post has been left open for community input.
We are also hosting an internal retro in the following weeks and will publish further results and learnings. And as always, a detailed blog post will be published on the day that payouts are distributed.
If you know of any projects violating any of our agreements, please do let us know.
We’re also always looking for direct feedback from the community on which improvements would make GG24 even better. Please don’t hesitate to let us know!