Since the hard conversations around S14 budgeting, it seems to have become clear to many of the DAO memberes that Grants 2.0 is existential to the DAO. I can really feel a shift in momentum in the last 2 weeks. I have been very impressed to see that momentum around Grants 2.0 has been picking up over the last few weeks.
What Iโve observed:
0. @lthrift and @kevin.olsen have been doing a Grants 2.0 roadshow - showing off the strategy and architecture.
- Weekly demos of the round manager, grant hub, and dpopp for the last 2 weeks. (here is the latest)
- Grants 2.0 is being proposed as major part of the daos essential intent for the next 12-18 months
- Iโve seen many workstreams re-orienting their roadmaps around Grants 2.0.
I wanted to start this thread to ask the question:
- What would have to be true for the DAO to really begin to see momentum around Grants 2.0?
- What would have to be true for the DAO to build momentum around Grants 2.0?
- What would have to be true for the DAO to create great software
=>
become a market leader=>
get to sustainability (and beyond it, to thriving)=>
handsomely reward its constituents=>
repeat (the virtuous cycle I personally think the DAO should be aiming)?