[TEMP CHECK] Fair Fees for GG24

[griff]

@owocki

there are two ways we could go.

1. total is $100k from the funding sources (inc matching pool) and 10% taken from that.
2. total is $110k from the funding sources (inc matching pool) and 10% is taken from that.

I would vote #2… give wierd numbers to the operators, round numbers to the public.

@LuukDAO

My suggestion
Instead of a fixed fee, align on fee ranges that have to provide clear plans and argumentation if they want to request above-average fees.

Pool Size	Fee Range	% of Pool
$100k	~$10,000 - $15,000	10% - 15%
$500k	~$25,000 - $50,000	5% - 10%
$1M	~$40,000 - $80,000	4% - 8%
$5M	~$150,000 - $350,000	3% - 7%
$10M	$250,000 - $600,000	2,5% - 6%
$50M	$1,000,000 - $2,500,000	2% - 5%

Love the tIer range, I would suggest that for experiments under $100k there be a lot of freedom, and I would make the pool size a range… I added 2 more tiers:

Pool Size	% of Pool
<$100k	Case by Case
$100k-$250k	10% - 15%
$250k-$500k	7.5% - 12.5%
$500k-$1M	5% - 10%
$1M-$5M	4% - 8%
$5M-10M	3% - 7%
$10M-50M	2% - 6%
>$50M	1% - 5%

Percentage fees work for pure financial distribution, but projects like Pairwise which are trying to distribute other forms of capital (e.g. Reputation via an Award Ceremony) are capital efficient, but can’t operate in a capital efficient way if they have to increase pool size to make the cost of operation work.