I love that we are thinking in the same concepts here. My approach was to work with the Ethelo tool to not only surface the reviews (which we have evidence that reviewers are more likely to use and finish reviews), but also to find the true intersubjective consensus.
THIS IS A TEST
We worked to have this ready for this budget review time. https://gitcoinbudget.ethelo.net/
It uses the tool we use to review grants in FDD. They tool will find the least polarizing, highest consensus answers to allow us to make collective decisions.
I think combining a tool like this to allow us to rank the importance of “thin workstream” outcomes overall would be helpful. Then we could use it to review if the amounts being requested are reasonable.
@Rebelry and @M0nkeyFl0wer are working to make one better than this implementation for us, but this FDD designed first attempt can showcase quite a bit.
Additionally, we could weight the users input in a variety of ways. For example, stewards could weighted by their health score on the report cards. Then ANYONE could participate, but only stewards are weighted to the output scores. Many other options like this could be designed.