Accurate link to Simona’s Gitcoin Mission & Vision post.
However, the first two paragraphs do appear in the Sept TLDR post, under We build for human thriving.
For me, the second paragraph does describe what I believe, and the following two are good, if somewhat whimsical. But I’m not a fan of the first one, simply because it is formulated ambiguously, between ‘in proportion’, ‘their value’ and ‘their geographic location’. And we found out since Sept that locations do matter…
An organization does not have a ‘voice’, in the sense of not having a corporeal physical existence, but it can certainly have a speaker. There is no doubt that for Gitcoin, beyond being the founder, you are the visionary and the speaker.
Still, foundational statements made on behalf of the DAO could be further confirmed as accurate and representative through some form of a referendum or a process of ratification.