Thank you Armand. This is the first policy amendment being posted as a result of a grant appeal and I am struggling to shrink it, while providing full details. The full debates really happened here, and this is my attempt at proper proposal formatting, to get to a steward vote.
We thought 3 days was sufficient debate time, but with the weekend ahead the debate/poll will stay open till mid-next week. I wasn’t sure about some options…like should voting be private? should the results be available immediately or ? If you have any strong thoughts about the best ways to use forum polls please let me know! I thought hidden-results and confidential voting would bring the most accurate reflections out.
The FDD Source Council voted on the outstanding appeals, to determine which ones had merit and are worthy of Steward’s Time. Four appeal requests made it through the FDD vote and will be presented in the Gov Forum for a Steward vote. This is the first.
It is clear from the related comments in the ‘Novel Case #1’ post that we have diverse opinions about the best way to move forward. I don’t see why we can’t do it all. Use the policy revision as a short term solution while DaoOPs works out the best metrics to consider. In the event the metrics being discussed here never materialize at least we are in a better position.