[Proposal] Ratify the Results of GG18 and Formally Request the Community Multisig Holders to Payout Matching Allocations

[umarkhaneth]

@ale.k

if a particular project has additional questions about the rules/logic that their community triggered- this can be addressed in greater detail for their instance.

Since sybil action shouldn’t be conflated with self-attack- I think it would be helpful for groups like @yazdini and @priyank

Great nuanced points here as expected from @ale.k , especially about how hard it can be to tell the actor behind sybil action. Also thank you for sanity-checking the results.

@DistributedDoge

Thank you and rest of Gitcoin team for publishing updated results.

Thank you for being so engaged and asking for more transparency. This doesn’t happen without that! Please keep doing it

@jengajojo

As feedback, maybe there can be a zkproof attached to the results so folks can confirm the calculations match the logic provided.

Interesting, I don’t know enough about zkproofs to know if this is possible but would be quite cool if so.

@jengajojo

I’d like to ask what the time distribution looks for producing these results? are there any specific leverage points which could reduce the time to output significantly?

One of the big improvements this round was having regendata which makes it much easier to access clean data sets from grants stack, passport, and onchain. I can’t think of other specific leverage points besides having more/better detection methods ready to go in advance of the round ending