Incident Regarding Mistransferred Treasury Funds

[carlosjmelgar]

I voted “Abstain” because my self delegated tokens wont make an impact on the decision and would be more visible in grey than in red.

Connor raises many valid concerns.

@connor

I don’t feel like any real ownership has been taken over the mistake (and I don’t think it’s Tally’s fault)

I thought these severance payments bundled with Devconnect expenses was a result of the mistake, but it is unclear. These could have been separated in sub bullet points for clarity.

@connor

I am still a bit unsettled about the $100k+ sent from the CSDO multisig to MMM of which there still hasn’t been any acknowledgment of it, unclear whether that was free gift or if it’s supposed to be paid back by this budget, if that will happen again, etc

+1 - With more clarity on the use of these funds, this vote does seem rushed and prevents proper procedures to be put in place through DAO participation. The idea of a DAO Guardians sounds redundant now that the DAO Infra Workstream (?) proposal (?) went up.

@jengajojo

I second this and is absolutely necessary from a decentralisation pov! For the actual implementation, while I have designed and delivered many delegates programs myself, for gitcoin we can perhaps start with a ‘Delegates QF Round’ each quarter or so and iterate from there?

Bullish on this idea. Leaning in favor of this being a community led initiative (as it aligns with new EIs), rather than this being caked into another workstream’s roadmap.