Hello from FireEyes _â:fire:
Fire Eyes has been observing governance and token discussions across different projects, and we see an opportunity to help create value in the Gitcoin ecosystem.
A few developments that have happened in the last couple weeks:
- Uniswap Fee Switch For Protocol Governors
- Uniswap fee switch discussion is currently ongoing. Gitcoin being able to move in a similar direction would be valid and beneficial.
- Gitcoin Whitepaper Launch
- This announcement and launch has shown the direction forward for Gitcoin as a growth driver for Ethereum ecosystem.
- Gitcoin Grants Stack / Allo Adoption Increasing
- Gitcoin has continued seeing higher adoption from many different projects across the ecosystem.
In the wake of these recent developments, we think the time is right to start thinking about GTC sustainability for Gitcoin - building more clear value accrual and sustainability to GTC.
Weâll focus on what we believe to be the three most impactful ways GTC can accrue value:
- Allo Fee Switch
- Passport Staking
- GTC Venture Fund
In this post, we will dive into the merits of each; hopefully beginning to drive discussion and eventually consensus about which should be pursued by the DAO.
1 - Allo Fee Switch & Staking
Allo protocol in its current version has had $60m in volume. One very easy and clear change we could make is to introduce a fee switch to Allo protocol, allowing Gitcoin to take a percentage of that volume into its treasury.
Uniswaps recent discussion on the activation of their fee switch provides some guidance about how this could happen, and the benefits of doing so.
Although Gitcoin is a different protocol to uniswap, the foundation of these decisions should be same. Protocols cannot sustain being public goods indefinitely and leaning into value accrual as a protocol is important. There are however reasonable discussion points that this type of fee switch could damage Gitcoins public goods reputation, hereâs how we feel that we can mitigate this:
- Start with making the checkout process have an optional donation/fee to Gitcoin DAO.
- Only enact the fee switch on the official Gitcoin frontend, and let others deploy their own frontends without fee switches.
- Provide ways to route around the fee switch through holding / staking GTC?
Allo has established itself as a credible tool for capital allocation, projects with large sums of capital have two incentives to use Allo with a fee switch.
- It has pre-existing infrastructure which is easy to use, making the fee worthwhile.
- Using Allo (with a fee) also means that you also contributing to public goods inherently by contributing to the sustainability of public goods infrastructure.
2. Passport Staking
Gitcoin Passport has staked 1.5m of GTC so far (source). This is roughly 1.5% of the total supply staked within Passport within the first 18 months of launch during a bear market.
Sybil resistance has continued to be at the forefront of protocol and airdrop design, with projects like Worldcoin having significant valuations solving the same problem in a different way. Being able to capture some of this value for GTC via Passport presents like an achievable and impactful goal.
We encourage Gitcoin to continue to focus on identity staking and build more sybil resistance mechanisms into the Passport ecosystem, as well as more aggressively propagating passport throughout the Ethereum ecosystem.
Ensuring GTC is the primary mechanism for passport staking and security longterm is also a high priority for the protocol.
We see a possible next step of crafting a DAO wide strategy to further adoption of Gitcoin passport across the ecosystem.
3. GTC Venture Fund
Gitcoin has delivered $60m value to over 3700 different grants over the past 5 years, a key contributor to Ethereumâs growth and success.
These grant rounds have supported countless teams and projects from their earliest stages, with GTC being the key mechanism to enable this support through governance and infrastructure development.
Gitcoin has an extensive track record of projects funded: Uniswap, WalletConnect, Yearn Finance, etc. If Gitcoin and GTC could have been distributed even a small fraction of ownership from these protocols to reinvest Gitcoinâs future it would have been immensely valuable.
The main reason to create a âGitcoin venture matchingâ fund is the dealflow that Gitcoin has access to, since many of these projects come to Gitcoin at inception it allows for the projects to be sufficiently supported, whilst allowing Gitcoin to share in their future upside.
In practice this is likely a GTC matching pool managed by a Hats structure where an elected âGTC venture committeeâ distributes additional GTC incentives to projects that are willing to share future ownership / token allocation back to the GTC DAO.
Where a grants matching funds are doubled* (*open for discussion on this exact number) by the GTC venture committee in exchange for a future commitment of sharing any tokens, revenue or upside the project ends up accruing.
This effectively makes Gitcoin into an âEthereum Emerging Market Fundâ that has upside in each of the up & coming projects coming through the grants funnel.
The ask behind this would be community feedback on how to best structure a âGTC Venture Committeeâ, create a new treasury for the venture arm and possible deal term templates to create efficiency in this area. We do not want Gitcoin to focus too hard on capturing the most value out of seeding projects but rather have some exposure to be able to reinvest in public goods longterm.
Conclusion
As Gitcoin grows, there will be a handful of different directions through which GTC value could accrue. We welcome feedback from the Gitcoin community as to which directions we think could be most fruitful.
We think the first step should be setting up a GTC Venture Committee because this is the most time sensitive value add and potentially holds the largest upside for GitcoinDAO.
Allo and Passport are also high impact value adds, but would benefit from taking more time for the community to build out and iterate on the mechanisms and structure involved.
We at FireEyes deeply believe in Gitcoinâs mission of expanding Ethereumâs ecosystem in a virtuous way, but we also want to be sensitive towards the sustainability of GTC and Gitcoin itself.
Any and all feedback from the community would be very helpful, specifically on each of the three core proposals and how to best roll them out.