[GG24] Sensemaking Report at Pre&Post-Grant Coordination | From Allocation to Alignment & Accountability

🧐 Gitcoin Sensemaking Szn
,
7

Reposting @sepu85 comment from the directory below…

thanks for this compelling work @deltajuliet , regarding my proposal [GG24] Sensemaking Report at Pre&Post-Grant Coordination | From Allocation to Alignment & Accountability it is true (actually it’s deliberately) we did not proposed a grant domain. Our aim is indeed to validate with Gitcoin and its community Collabberry’s solution is actually needed by the Public Good’s space. Very inline with @owocki 's comment on that post:

I’m gonna start doing that suggested work this week, still, I need some clarifications as per what I’ve understood from your points “Eligibility Rule of Thumb” for marking proposals as ineligible, this proposal does not match those. I understand the N/A punctuation as we didn’t propose a specific domain, but instead we want to collaborate with them all. Can you please clarify? Wouldn’t make sense to put this into another category like “Need Validation from Community”??

Some comments about:

  • interesting coordination tooling: thanks :slight_smile: , we just want to bring fairness, transparency and aligned incentives among contributors and projects!
  • No capital strategy: not proposing an own domain, it wouldn’t make sense.
  • No mechanism: Collabberry is in itself a capital allocation mechanism, the whole idea of this proposal is to include such a mechanism into Gitcoin’s mechanism portfolio.
  • No deliverables: didn’t want to flood the proposal before having feedback from the community about how this would be appreciated by other domains, but we could indeed add a few, started by the mentioned in the post: