GG24 Sense Making Report: Breaking into Enterprise

GG24 Sense Making Report: Breaking into Enterprise

Problem & Impact

Problem

Ethereum has grown in leaps and bounds since its inception however one challenge has remained illusive, the challenge of adoption in Enterprise. Recent developments in crypto regulation globally have reduced the levels of uncertainty around Ethereum blockchain adoption in the Enterprise space however, Enterprise adoption specifically as part of operational systems is still a big issue. Simply put the massive opportunity that Ethereum brings to the Enterprise space is that for realtime transaction billing and settlement. Billions are lost in transactional inefficiencies that arise as organisations get larger, more diverse and more competitive. The introduction of Ethereum into the space combining crypto money, blockchain transactions and smart contracts begins a systemization process that not only cuts waste but also opens up new avenues of commerce well beyond the Web 2 revolution.

Urgency

The urgency of this problem comes from the rise in Artificial Intelligence as a competing emerging integrative technology. In short AI is making phenomenal inroads into the Enterprise space at a pace that has never been seen before. The real danger for Ethereum is that AI allows Enterprise to remain siloed leveraging legacy commercial mechanics. This further creates a space for legacy services to evolve in a direction away from Ethereum forcing it to remain a niche. This can be seen in the current evolution of Agentic AI e.g. N8n, Make.com which integrates with common task based platforms such as Slack, Zapier, Telegram etc. To understand this problem in perspective organizations from operators such as British Telecom to retail giants Best Buy have been aggressively embracing AI to optimize their operations. In short Ethereum is facing the clouds of a black swan moment that in the best case deals a lot of damage and in the worst case renders meaningless.

Impact

The impact of solving this challenge at this point in time will be small but seismic. In short it will reposition Ethereum as the go to integrative platform for digital operations. It will further refocus the Ethereum discussion on transaction throughput (not speed) supporting the scaling discourse and providing a clear evidence based directive on the direction onward evolution should take.

Sense Making

To understand the problem at it’s fundament we looked at who is hiring for blockchain development. The predominant employers were Ethereum ecosystem participants themselves, this being across a number of portals such as web3.career, cryptojoblist.com and cryptocurrencyjobs.com. Juxtapose this against recruitment of Java Developers derived from Google, the variety of industries hiring is very wide. When we look at the dispersion across AI recruitment (using only Google) it’s pattern follows that of Java Developers signifying a much greater and faster technology uptake. More importantly AI is getting something right that Ethereum has not quite figured out yet.

Gitcoin’s Unique Role & Fundraising

Gitcoin’s Unique Role

Addressing this challenge is where Gitcoin can really shine, as the solution to the Enterprise challenge has to be community driven. Community is what works in big corporate, big pharma and so on. Community knows the pain points and access points to Enterprise intimately, but more than that it is community that can source the solutions to the Enterprise conundrum which is quite complex but extremely solvable. In short the Gitcoin network is a more dynamic and responsive mechanism for solving the Enterprise challenge for Ethereum as it avoids the group think that is associated with tasking a single organization or group of them to come up with solutions.

Fundraising

The funding model for this would consist of engaging partners such as Spork DAO, Arbitrum DAO, Optimism Foundation, NEAR Foundation, and other major networks, to create a community fund for Enterprise Innovation $50k+ that allows for community based sourcing and solution of enterprise issues followed by real world deployment.

Success Measurement & Reflection

The success metrics for this initiative for the first 6 months have been kept simple:

  1. Number of common industry issues successfully identified and scoped (the market)
  2. Number of successful community solutions developed (the providers)
  3. Number of successful service deployments delivered or planned (the new economy)

To measure the genuine impact, of this initiative we would measure the organic conversation and news coverage of downstream enterprise initiatives that were spawned but potentially did not complete prior to the 6 month measuring window.

For the community the “legacy” would be from the developed case studies from the initiative which would enable Enterprise members to leverage the learnings and begin their own organization internal initiatives. Simply without this data the task of attempting to convince an Exec 25 years in the making to gamble their career on Ethereum is neigh on impossible.

Domain information

This grant would propose a new Domain for GG24 . This would be an enduring domain as the Enterprise challenge affects all aspects of daily life.
Domain experts would be sourced from from participating enterprises and sponsoring organizations.
Depending on the success of the initial round, industry focused sub rounds are a likely outcome of this initiative.

Draft Scorecard

2025/08/18 - Version 0.1.1

By Owocki

Prepared for Tony Kunz (cryptotwilight) re: “GG24 Sense Making Report: Breaking into Enterprise”

(vibe-researched-and-written by an LLM using this prompt, iterated on, + edited for accuracy quality and legibility by owocki himself.)

Proposal Comprehension

TITLE
GG24 Sense Making Report: Breaking into Enterprise

AUTHOR
Tony Kunz (forum handle: cryptotwilight)

URL
https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg24-sense-making-report-breaking-into-enterprise/23026

TLDR

You propose a new GG24 domain focused on breaking Ethereum into enterprise operations. The plan is to mobilize community discovery of concrete enterprise problems, fund community-built solutions, and drive real deployments. Success would be measured by issues scoped, solutions developed, deployments planned or delivered, and downstream conversation, with a fundraising target that includes partners like SporkDAO, Arbitrum, Optimism, and NEAR. The idea is timely but needs sharper scope, named experts, concrete allocation mechanics, and fast-path deliverables by October.

Proposers

PROPOSERS
Tony Kunz

THEIR_CREDENTIALS
Entrepreneur and community builder in web3. Gitcoin forum profile notes grant and hackathon wins and L1 or L2 ecosystem work. Public footprint includes JobCrypt and related community efforts. If there are additional core contributors, name them.

Domain Experts

Not yet named. The post says experts would be sourced from participating enterprises and sponsors.

To be determined. You should pre-commit at least 3 named advisors or enterprise partners.

Problem

Enterprise adoption of Ethereum for core operations lags, while AI tools are racing ahead inside traditional stacks. Without a wedge into real enterprise workflows, Ethereum risks remaining niche.

Solution

Stand up a community driven enterprise domain that surfaces high value problems, funds solution pilots, and documents case studies that other enterprises can copy. Target a pooled fund with ecosystem partners and run industry focused sub rounds if there is traction.

Risks

  1. Boil the ocean risk. “Enterprise” is many markets with different needs and procurement cycles. Without a narrow wedge, discovery spreads thin and no pilot lands.
  2. Timeline risk. Meaningful deployments inside large orgs usually require security review, legal, and vendor onboarding. Getting measurable wins by October is hard unless scope is very tight and partners are lined up.
  3. Fuzzy allocation method. The proposal does not define how funds will be deployed. For example challenge prizes, RFPs, milestone bounties, pilot reimbursements, or co-funded proof of concepts. Lack of method invites mismatches between problems and grants.
  4. Partner dependency. The fundraising section lists potential partners but no commitments. If matching funds do not land, the scope must shrink or quality drops.
  5. Duplicative surface area. There are existing enterprise blockchain groups and solution vendors. If we do not differentiate around open source outcomes and credible public goods, we risk reinventing wheels.
  6. Measurement ambiguity. Success metrics are volume based. Without pre-specified target industries, unit economics, and adoption gates, it is hard to prove real value creation.

Outside Funding

Not secured. The post lists target partners and a pooled fund concept. Please confirm soft commits, target amounts, and conditions.

Why Gitcoin?

The unique angle is open source enterprise pilots that become shared playbooks and components. If we focus on reproducible case studies, Gitcoin can create public goods that traditional vendors will not.

Owockis scorecard

# Criterion Score (0-2) Notes
1 Problem Focus – Clearly frames a real problem, (one that is a priority), avoids “solutionism” 1 Important problem and timely, but scope is very broad. Needs a crisp wedge market and specific use cases.
2 Credible, High leverage, Evidence-Based Approach – Solutions are high-leverage and grounded in credible research 1 Community discovery can be high leverage. The method is not specified enough to judge evidence or leverage. Add references and prior art.
3 Domain Expertise – Proposal has active involvement from recognized experts 0 No named experts or enterprise partners yet. Please add named advisors and letters of intent.
4 Co-Funding – Has financial backing beyond just Gitcoin 0 No committed co-funding listed. Targets only.
5 Fit-for-Purpose Capital Allocation Method – Methodology matches the epistemology of the domain 0 Allocation mechanics are unspecified. You need a clear mechanism and review rubric for enterprise pilots.
6 Execution Readiness – Can deliver meaningful results by October 0 Unclear that scoped issues, funded pilots, and at least one deployment can land by October without pre-committed partners.
7 Other - general vibe check and other stuff I may have missed aboev… 1 Constructive intent and useful direction. Needs sharper design and commitments to be fundable in GG24 timelines.

Score

Total Score: 3 / 14
Confidence in score: 55%

Feedback:

Major

  • Narrow the wedge. Pick 1 to 2 industries and 3 to 5 concrete problems where Ethereum has a clear edge, like machine readable invoices, post trade settlement, or partner to partner reconciliation. Land a beachhead, then expand.
  • Name your team and advisors. List the domain experts and enterprise partners with letters of intent.

Minor

  • Lock in co-funding. Secure at least one external funder or an enterprise pilot budget.
  • Define success beyond counts. Add KPI targets like cost saved per transaction, time to reconcile, number of users in a pilot, and open source components published.
  • Specify the allocation design. Show the end to end flow: problem intake, triage rubric, challenge briefs, selection process, milestone gates, IP and licensing, security review, and a deployment pathway with an enterprise sponsor.

Steel man case for/against:

For

A Gitcoin hosted enterprise domain could surface problems that vendors ignore and convert them into open playbooks and components. If you recruit 3 strong enterprise partners, run tight challenge briefs, and publish replicable case studies, Ethereum can get a credible wedge into operations. This creates compounding public goods and a pipeline for future domain sub rounds.

Against

Enterprise change cycles are slow. Without named partners, a defined mechanism, and money in hand, the work risks becoming general research and conversations. The scope is broad and may drift. Competing AI investments inside enterprises are already budgeted and will outpace unfocused blockchain pilots.

Rose/ Bud/Thorn

ROSE
You are tackling a real and important gap. Framing Gitcoin’s role as community driven problem discovery and open deployment is aligned with public goods.

THORN
Scope is too broad, experts and funders are not committed, and the allocation method is undefined. The October timeline looks unrealistic without pre-aligned enterprise pilots.

BUD
Pick a single sector, like supply chain or telco billing, and run one tight challenge with a named enterprise co-sponsor. Use milestone bounties and a pilot reimbursement pool. Publish a polished case study and reusable code so others can copy it. This can blossom into a set of industry sub rounds in 2026.

Feedback

Did I miss anything or get anything wrong? FF to let me know in the comments.

Research Notes

  • Unclear which enterprise buyers are engaged and whether any pilots are pre-discussed.
  • No named advisors or experts yet. This is the biggest gap.
  • Consider partnering with an industry association or open standards body to reduce procurement friction.

Welcome @cryptotwilight!

Evaluated using my steward scorecard — reviewed and iterated manually for consistency, clarity, and alignment with GG24 criteria.


:x: Submission Compliance Check

  • Problem & Impact: :white_check_mark: framed as “Ethereum’s enterprise gap vs. AI adoption”
  • Sensemaking Analysis: :warning: limited — relies on job board comparisons, not systematic research
  • Gitcoin Fit & Fundraising: :warning: possible, but no commitments or mechanism design included
  • Success Metrics & Reflection: :white_check_mark: lists counts (scoped problems, solutions, deployments), but vague attribution
  • Domain Info: :x: no named experts or allocation mechanics

Verdict: Not fully compliant — missing confirmed experts, allocation design, and committed co-funders.


:bar_chart: Scorecard Evaluation

Total Score: 4 / 16

# Criteria Score Notes
1 Problem Clarity & Relevance 2 Enterprise adoption gap is real and timely; AI comparison raises urgency
2 Sensemaking Approach 1 Relies on job board + AI hiring comparisons — thin evidence base
3 Gitcoin Fit & Uniqueness 1 Gitcoin could play a unique convening role, but role vs. existing enterprise consortia not clear
4 Fundraising Plan 0 Lists possible partners (SporkDAO, Arbitrum, Optimism, NEAR) but no commitments
5 Capital Allocation Design 0 No mechanism (challenge prizes, RFPs, pilots) specified
6 Domain Expertise & Delivery 0 No named experts or enterprises onboard
7 Clarity & Completeness 0 Broad scope; lacks crisp wedge or October deliverables
8 Gitcoin Support Required 0 Would need Gitcoin to provide everything: stewarding, design, ops, and fundraising

:pushpin: Feedback for Improvement

Where I agree with @owocki:

  • Needs a wedge market — “enterprise” is too broad. Pick 1–2 sectors (e.g. supply chain, telco billing) and focus.
  • Allocation method is missing — define RFPs, milestones, or challenge briefs.
  • Experts and funders must be confirmed; otherwise, this cannot ship on GG24 timelines.

What I’d add:

  • Current framing reads more like an aspiration than an actionable domain. Enterprises move slowly; without pre-committed pilots, nothing meaningful lands by October.
  • KPIs should measure cost savings, rec

:x: Ineligibility Note

While the problem statement is important and timely, this proposal does not meet baseline requirements for eligibility:

  • No confirmed domain experts or stewards
  • No co-funding commitments
  • No defined allocation mechanism

As written, it reads aspirational rather than executable, and cannot be considered compliant with GG24 criteria.