Welcome @cryptotwilight!
Evaluated using my steward scorecard — reviewed and iterated manually for consistency, clarity, and alignment with GG24 criteria.
Submission Compliance Check
- Problem & Impact:
framed as “Ethereum’s enterprise gap vs. AI adoption” - Sensemaking Analysis:
limited — relies on job board comparisons, not systematic research - Gitcoin Fit & Fundraising: possible, but no commitments or mechanism design included
- Success Metrics & Reflection: lists counts (scoped problems, solutions, deployments), but vague attribution
- Domain Info: no named experts or allocation mechanics
Verdict: Not fully compliant — missing confirmed experts, allocation design, and committed co-funders.
Scorecard Evaluation
Total Score: 4 / 16
| # | Criteria | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Problem Clarity & Relevance | 2 | Enterprise adoption gap is real and timely; AI comparison raises urgency |
| 2 | Sensemaking Approach | 1 | Relies on job board + AI hiring comparisons — thin evidence base |
| 3 | Gitcoin Fit & Uniqueness | 1 | Gitcoin could play a unique convening role, but role vs. existing enterprise consortia not clear |
| 4 | Fundraising Plan | 0 | Lists possible partners (SporkDAO, Arbitrum, Optimism, NEAR) but no commitments |
| 5 | Capital Allocation Design | 0 | No mechanism (challenge prizes, RFPs, pilots) specified |
| 6 | Domain Expertise & Delivery | 0 | No named experts or enterprises onboard |
| 7 | Clarity & Completeness | 0 | Broad scope; lacks crisp wedge or October deliverables |
| 8 | Gitcoin Support Required | 0 | Would need Gitcoin to provide everything: stewarding, design, ops, and fundraising |
Feedback for Improvement
Where I agree with @owocki:
- Needs a wedge market — “enterprise” is too broad. Pick 1–2 sectors (e.g. supply chain, telco billing) and focus.
- Allocation method is missing — define RFPs, milestones, or challenge briefs.
- Experts and funders must be confirmed; otherwise, this cannot ship on GG24 timelines.
What I’d add:
- Current framing reads more like an aspiration than an actionable domain. Enterprises move slowly; without pre-committed pilots, nothing meaningful lands by October.
- KPIs should measure cost savings, rec
Ineligibility Note
While the problem statement is important and timely, this proposal does not meet baseline requirements for eligibility:
- No confirmed domain experts or stewards
- No co-funding commitments
- No defined allocation mechanism
As written, it reads aspirational rather than executable, and cannot be considered compliant with GG24 criteria.