GG22 Community Rounds Eligibility Criteria

[mars]

Discrepancy:

@MathildaDV

The Community Council will vote on the proposals; the council will decide on the amount of rounds & how to allocate matching funds depending on the quality of applications received.

@MathildaDV

The Community Council will vote on proposals, selecting the top 8 and allocating matching funds to the top 5 rounds.

Suggestion. Potential evaluation criteria.

@mars

An example: (totally unofficial, me thinking aloud)

Criteria	Weight
Innovation	25%
Impact	25%
Credentials of the team	15%
Previous track record of rounds	15%
Alignment with Gitcoin values	10%
Personal preference / intuition / gut feeling	10%

Suggestion. Multiple independent votes. Can be on the scale 0-10 on each criterium. Remove extremes. Average the middle ones.

Suggestion. In spirit of transparency, the voting results should be public. Can be anonymised.

@mars

@MathildaDV

The voting for which rounds to accept was conducted in CharmVerse, and was ranked according to average rubric scores.

I’m curious, please share the link.

---

Previously the ᴘʟᴀɴᴇᴛᴀʀʏ ᴄᴏᴜɴᴄɪʟ application wasn’t strong enough, this time determined to make it fully compliant and ace GG22