Sweet, thanks for this @jengajojo! Would love some clarification around a couple of things…
we have analyzed key aspects of the DAO’s governance and here are our suggestions.
Does this include community feedback or simply a DAOplomats audit?
Based on what a proposal finally aims to achieve, the proposer can decide on a category and subcategory and proceed with the governance flow. The forum categories can be modified to reflect these changes.
These definitions & examples are great but look less tailored to Gitcoin as an org. Are these standard examples or are you suggesting that we create some of these policies for the org?
Create a DAO constitution
Is this different to our process outlined here by simply a different name? This is also taking into consideration your notes on the DAO manual below (removing/updating the structure) which currently lives in Gitbook.
Recategorise and organise governance roles from various types to three main types
- Governooor: Hard pass on this naming.
- Also worth noting there is no formal CSDO anymore.
- How does this tie into the defining community work that @CoachJonathan is doing?
In general I’m supportive of initiatives that improve our governance, including this one, but what I’m not seeing are the expected outcomes of this work or over-arching goals for these improvements. Would love to see those laid out!